Final Draft

<Robots With Common Sense>

Difficult, Dirty, Dangerous things, robots do these things instead of us as technologies are developed. For instance, already many household clean the room by automated vacuum cleaners that people don't have to work. It is equipped with a number of sensor, so vacuum can clean the room with avoiding the obstacle. Moreover, robots clean the dirty drain pipes. People can control the robots to wash up and they can watch the process by their camera. If there are not robots, human should these dirty things. Robots also surgery people in hospital. Robots are more detailed and elaborated than people, so the dangerous of surgery is less then human. Like this, Robots are helpful to human. However, According to the book named Harvard Sampler, robots don't have any common sense that human have.  Common sense is a basic ability to perceive, understand, and judge things, which is shared by ("common to") nearly all people, and can be reasonably expected of nearly all people without any need for debate. If we can copy our common sense to robots, our lives would be more comfortable. They can think the owners order, and judge them selves what the owner needs. However, the problems of robots with common sense includes with risk, unemployment, and humans lethargy are much bigger than convenience of robots with common sense. So we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.

  First, robots with common sense take our job. It means that as robots appearance, humans unemployment rate are decreased. According to the book named “Robots Will Steal Your Job, But That’s OK", The author believes this taking will happen in two stages. First, computers would start replacing people in specially vulnerable fields like transportation/logistics, labor, and administrative support. Jobs in services, sales, and construction may also be lost in this first stage. Then, the rate of replacement will slow down due to bottlenecks in harder-to-automate fields such engineering. This “technological plateau” will be followed by a second wave of computerization, dependent upon the development of good artificial intelligence. This could next put jobs in management, science and engineering, and the arts at risk. Actually, now already appear the humans unemployment because of robots. 
According to  upper infographic in Focus Magagine, it shows that robots takes our job in many kinds of job. Of course the robots are applicable in normal robots. If the robots with common sense appear, the unemployment rates are increased. 

  There are another reasons that we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots ,and it is about robots threaten. Robots don't feel any pain and they don't have some emotions to sympathy because they are just a lump of scrap mental. At currents, The Activists warned "killer robots" could threaten human rights.Thanks to advanced engineering, technology and artificial intelligence, it could be capable of operating and firing weaponry autonomously in the not-too-distant future. But it would not be able to distinguish between combatants and civilian, and even they can notice it, as they don't have any feeling like sympathy, they would kill people indiscriminately. Even they are remarkable in memorizing, and math, so their strategy and technologies will be much better than human. Also, the renowned physicist Steven Hawking warns that rise of robots may be disastrous for mankind.

  Imagine your house with robot helper have a common sense. You don't have to make a meal ,clean up the house and even do your homework instead of you on the troublesome weekend. People must get lazy because of robots. Even they must not feel thankful for anythings. They can't feel the value of real life. According to the news script, robots makes our lives more lazy. In this script, technology is, by definition, increasing the amount of work machines do, and, by proxy, increasing the amount of laziness present among humans. As high-industries are on the rise, technology is improved on and innovated upon more and more; the open market only spurs on this trend. As a result, the more technology improves, the lazier humans as a whole become.

 Someone wonder If robots can have common sense by our technologies. But their are the scientist who created the robots with common sense almost, Ben Goertzel. It indicates that human can create the robots with common sense. Humans common sense are based on the ability to learn. For example, Babies are born with the ability to learn and seek out knowledge, in the same routes, if robots common sense are created, it will be the equivalent  will learn and seek out knowledge. If scientists develop the technologies more, we can create the robots with common sense in the early day. 

  Through my topic, people can know about robot ethics. Robot ethics is the rule that  regulate ahead dangerous things that robot can cause. In 2007, South Korea tried to  publish the robot ethics charter for world first, but It didn't formalized. But it should be formalized sometime for future. Our robots technologies are developed gradually. Appearance of robots with common sense, people should regulate the humans behaviors, and ensure the safety can appear at the use process. For studying my topic, we can regulate and prevent the risk by robots in the future. 

  Some said that robots with common sense are helpful in engineering, medical,  and combat. But it can make the society even confused. In the engineering, as I said, the robots take peoples jobs and makes people lazy. There also will be the problem of mass unemployment. Even in the medical, the operation error is more fatal than humans mistakes. According to the Bloomberg News, they reported in February that the FDA was surveying surgeons about the robots after an increase in reported adverse events, including 70 deaths since 2009. Reports of injuries linked to robotic surgery have more than doubled in the first eight months of this year, based on when the reports were received by the FDA, compared with the same period last year. And in the combat, Robots are dangerous weapon because they don't feel any pain and sympathy . 

  Also, there are the people who argue that robots with common sense solve the society problems. For example, 'Ibo' is the pet dog robots, it can express the emotion like anger, surprising, and hunger. These robots are using well to senior citizens who live alone, and the people who needs some friends. But It even can make a backfire. The robots don't have any emotions, so people will notice they are not like human soon. Iet make the people more fufil. And it can make weaken the fellowship between human and human.

The development of robots are important to humans and our descendants. It makes humans lives more comfortable and effective. But maybe it can be a weapon or enemy to harm us. Also, robots cause an influence in the field of industry, economics, and society changes. Especially, common sense is make the robots more intelligent, powerful, and more efficiently.So for the safety of our life and society of humans, we shouldn't copy our common sense to robot. 

<Reference>

Common sense

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_sense

“Robots Will Steal Your Job, But That’s OK",

 http://robotswillstealyourjob.com/

upper infographic 

http://realitypod.com/2010/10/statistics-show-how-robots-are-increasing-unemployment/

killer robots 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/killer-robots-could-threaten-basic-human-rights-activists-warn/

artificial intelligence

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence

Steven Hawking

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/05/05/stephen-hawkings-ominous-warning-about-robots/

news script

http://www.insidetechnology360.com/index.php/is-technology-making-humans-more-lazy-yes-5968/

Ben Goertzel

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929260.300-to-create-a-robot-with-common-sense-mimic-a-toddler.html#.VGiigzSsXwE.

robot ethics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roboethics

Bloomberg News

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-10-08/robot-surgery-damaging-patients-rises-with-marketing.html

Week 14. Peer Review for 20518 이정민

Grade
According to the rubric above, what grade would you give this essay? Why?
This essay deserves five points. it displays an interesting and unique perspective on a highly specialized topic.

How does this essay need to improve to get a better grade?


Thesis
What is the thesis?

Internet doesn't develop us.

Is the thesis clear and debatable?
Yes

If you (The reviewer) wrote this essay, how would you have written the thesis?
I would agree with this thesis with explain the advantages of internet.

Any other thoughts?
good introduction.

Classical Argument
Can you easily identify the 5 parts of the classical argument? If no, what parts are missing?
Yes

Does the introduction catch your attention? Does it comfortably lead to the thesis? 
Yes.

Does the narration give all the necessary background information to understand the topic?
I think, yes it did.

Does the confirmation adequately support the thesis?
Yes.

Does the refutation and concession address a realistic counterpoint? Does it adequately dispute the counterpoint, or respond in a reasonable manner? 
I think it is enough.

Does the conclusion summarize the article and address the larger significance of the thesis? 
I think she should more summarize her opinion.

What suggestions do you have for improving the classical argument structure?
I think her structure was good.

Persuasion
When you started reading the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis? 
I disagreed with it.

When you finished the essay, did you agree or disagree with the thesis?
I still disagree with this.

If your mind changed, why? What parts of the essay were persuasive?


How could the author enhance the persuasive parts of their essay?
She should develop her refutation more.

Research
Is the author using research effectively? 
yes 

Is the research from appropriate sources?
yes

Are the sources obvious?
Yes

Are the pieces of evidence relevant to the thesis or essay?
yes

Are there any parts of the essay that need evidence to support the claims?
I think she would change her essay for APA style.

Second Draft

Difficult, Dirty, Dangerous things, robots do these things instead of us as technologies are developed. For instance, already many household clean the room by automated vacuum cleaners that people don't have to work. It is equipped with a number of sensor, so vacuum can clean the room with avoiding the obstacle. Moreover, robots clean the dirty drain pipes. People can control the robots to wash up and they can watch the process by their camera. If there are not robots, human should these dirty things. Robots also surgery people in hospital. Robots are more detailed and elaborated than people, so the dangerous of surgery is less then human. Like this, Robots are helpful to human. However, robots don't have any common sense that human have.  Common sense is a basic ability to perceive, understand, and judge things, which is shared by ("common to") nearly all people, and can be reasonably expected of nearly all people without any need for debate. If we copy our common sense to robots, our lives can be more comfortable. They can think the owners order, and judge them selves what the owner needs. However, the problems of robots with common sense includes with risk, misuse, and humans lethargy are much bigger than convenience of robots with common sense. So we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.


  In the movies named A.I, the robots have a common sense to judge them selves. They live their lives with helping humans. But human misuse and abuse them as they are not human. The main characters named David is the boy robots. Some parents buy the David for their son because their real son is refrigerated as the health problem. David was happy with his human mother, and the mother was too. But after the real son heal completed, David is thrown out. Like this movies, if there are the robots with common sense, we will misuse and abuse them. It is incorrect to robot ethics that robots and people should maintain.  

  There are another reasons that we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots ,and it is about robots threaten. In The movie named Terminator, robots rose in revolt against humans. Although it is the movie, but as our technologies are developing, human can make the robots like Terminator. Moreover, Robots don't feel any pain and they don't have some emotions to sympathy. The robots of presents are safety because they don't have any common sense. But If they have a common sense, they will plan a doubt why robots should obey to human. And they will attack human. Because they don't have any feeling, they will shoot all of people indiscriminately. Even they are remarkable in memorizing, and math. Their strategy and technologies will be much better than human. 

  Imagine your house with robot helper have a common sense. You don't have to make a meal ,clean up the house and even do your homework instead of you on the troublesome weekend. People must get lazy because of robots. Even they must not feel thankful for anythings. They can't feel the value of real life. Moreover, the companies also don't have to hire human. Robots with common sense will work harder than humans and their amount of work must be much larger that humans do. Even they don't have to pay a salary,and they must not mistake working.Then, The problem of mass unemployment is may be serious than presents. Even the presents that the robots without common sense also undergo the reason of a low employment rate. 

 Someone wonder If robots can have common sense by our technologies. But their are the scientist who created the robots with common sense almost, Ben Goertzel. It indicates that human can create the robots with common sense. Humans common sense are based on the ability to learn. For example, Babies are born with the ability to learn and seek out knowledge, in the same routes, if robots common sense are created, it will be the equivalent  will learn and seek out knowledge. If scientists develop the technologies more, we can create the robots with common sense in the early day. 

  Through my topic, people can know about robot ethics. Our robots technologies are developed gradually. Appearance of robots with common sense, people should regulate the humans behaviors, and ensure the safety can appear at the use process. For studying my topic, we can regulate and prevent the risk by robots in the future. 

  Some said that robots with common sense are helpful in engineering, medical, housework, agriculture, industry, and combat. But it can make the society even confused. In the engineering, the robots take peoples job. There will be the problem of mass unemployment. In the medical, the operation error is more fatal than humans mistakes. And in the combat, Robots are dangerous weapon because they don't feel any pain and sympathy . 

  Also, there are the people who argue that robots with common sense solve the society problems. For example, 'Ibo' is the pet dog robots, it can express the emotion like anger, surprising, and hunger. These robots are using well to senior citizens who live alone, and the people who needs some friends. But It even can make a backfire. The robots don't have any emotions, so people will notice they are not like human soon. It make the people more futile.

The development of robots are important to humans and our descendants. It makes humans lives more comfortable and effective. But maybe it can be a weapon or enemy to harm us. Also, robots cause an influence in the field of industry, economics, and society changes. For the safety of our societies, I insist that we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots. 

Research 6

Source: 
http://navercast.naver.com/contents.nhn?rid=20&contents_id=70862
My Topic:
We should copy our common sense to robots.

What I hope to learn from this source:

It is about robot ethics. 

Notes:

Final Thoughts: We should follow the robot ethics.

Week11, Self Evaluation

1) What score do you think you deserve? Here is the rubric:

I think I will receive 2 point for my first draft.

2) What did you do well?

I wrote my essay using many different data. And my essay topic is interesting.

3) What could you have done better?

I could write the essay more logically, and I should delete the unnecessary information.

4) Which part of the classical argument did you use the best?

My reputation is good because

5) Which part of the classical argument did you use the most poorly?

6) What's your strategy to make your second draft better? 

First Draft

  When I was young, I was dreamed the robot do my homework and housework instead of me. And now, as technologies are developed, my dream will become true in near futures. Robots originated in Czech "robota" means working. Like this meaning, robots work many things for help human. Robots work Difficult, Dirty, Dangerous job instead of humans. for instance, already many household clean the room by automated vacuum cleaners that people don't have to work. It is equipped with a number of sensor, so vacuum can clean the room with avoiding the obstacle. Moreover, robots clean the dirty drain pipes. If there are not robots, human should these dirty things. Robots also surgery people in hospital. Robots are more detailed and elaborated than people, so the dangerous of surgery is less then human. Like this, Robots are helpful to human. If we copy our common sense to robots, our lives can be more comfortable. However, there are also riskness, misuseness, and humans lethargy. So we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.

  In the movies named A.I, humans misuse the robots with common sense and feeling. There are the main characters named David is the boy robots. Some parents buy the David for their son because their real son is freeze as the health problem. David was happy with his human mother, and the mother also. But after the real son heal completed, David is thrown out. In this movies, humans always misuse and abuse the robots. So the robots have emotions are suffered with emotion. It is dislocated with ethics. 

  There are the another reasons that we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots because of robots threaten. Robots don't feel any pain and they don't have some emotions to sympathy. The robots of presents are safety because they don't have any common sense. But If they have a common sense, they will plan a doubt why we should obey to human. And they will attack human. Because they don't have any feeling, they will shoot all of people indiscriminately. It is the movie story about ' I, robot". It is the indicator that human should not copy our common sense to robots.

  If robots intellectual skills are same with humans that can sympathize humans emotion, some people will only depend and follow robots than human. They can't feel the value of real life. and the company also don't want to hire human. There will be the problem of mass unemployment. Even the robots without common sense also the reason of a low employment rate nowadays. 

 Artificial intelligence systems are based on the ability of a machine to learn. Babies for example are born with the ability to learn and seek out knowledge, in the same way if an artificial intelligence system is created, it too will be the equivalent to a new born baby in the sense that is will learn and seek out knowledge. Although the human brain's ability far surpasses any computer, if AI was created and it was powerful enough it would be just like a baby. It could be taught to be good or bad. A great example is that  the author states, "Because AI is learning based, there is a fearful thought in mind, will machines learn that being rich and successful is an advantage, then rage war against economic powers and then control the world? This is not unreasonable but as every major religion and philosophy tells us, you cannot appreciate happiness without experiencing sadness. If we are going to create, or help create, a truly intelligent being, then we have to accept that it will learn to hate, as well as to love. It will know bad, as well as Good, Wrong, as well as Right". Because many theorists and scientists believe that it is not unreasonable that AI can go wrong there have been propositions to develop AI with safeguards so that we can shut them down in case they turn against humans or do not obey commands. In recent years there has also been the development of a non for profit organization named "The Singularity Institution for Artificial Intelligence".

Some said that robots with common sense are helpful in engineering, medical, housework, agriculture, industry, and combat. But it can make the society even confused. In the engineering, the robots take peoples job. There will be the problem of mass unemployment. In the medical, the operation error is more fatal than humans mistakes. And in the combat, Robots are dangerous weapon because they don't feel any pain. 

Also, there are the people who argue that robots with common sense solve the society problems. For example, 'Ibo' is the pet dog robots, it can express the emotion like anger, surprising, and hunger . These robots are using well to senior citizens who live alone, and the people who needs some friends. But It even can make a backfire. The robots don't have any emotions, so people will notice they are not like human soon. It make the people more futile.
But I agree that the robots without common sense can be helpful to human
.
The development of robots are important to humans, and our descendants. It makes humans lives more comfortable and effective. But It only applies when human follow the robots ethics.Robots ethics  is often used in the sense that it is concerned with the behavior of humans, how humans design, construct, use and treat robots and other artificially intelligent beings, whereas * machine ethics is concerned with the behavior of robots themselves, whether or not they are considered artificial moral agents. While the issue is as old as the word robot,  robots ethics was probably first used by robotist Gianmarco Veruggio in 2002, who also served as chair of an Atelier funded by the European Robotics Research Network to outline areas where research may be needed. The road map effectively divided ethics of artificial intelligence into two sub-fields to accommodate researchers' differing interests. We should follow the robots ethics, so we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots. 

Week10. Conclusion

The development of robots are important to humans, and our descendants. It makes humans lives more comfortable and effective. But It only applies when human follow the robots ethics.Robots ethics  is often used in the sense that it is concerned with the behavior of humans, how humans design, construct, use and treat robots and other artificially intelligent beings, whereas * machine ethics is concerned with the behavior of robots themselves, whether or not they are considered artificial moral agents. While the issue is as old as the word robot,  robots ethics was probably first used by roboticist Gianmarco Veruggio in 2002, who also served as chair of an Atelier funded by the European Robotics Research Network to outline areas where research may be needed. The road map effectively divided ethics of artificial intelligence into two sub-fields to accommodate researchers' differing interests. We should follow the robots ethics, so we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots. 

Week9. Refutation and Concession

1. What is my thesis?
we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.

2. What is the opposite position?
We should copy our common sense to robots.

3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) Robots with common sense are helpful.
b) Robots can solve the society problem.

4. How will I counter those arguments?

a) Robots with common sense also harmful to human.

b) Robots make society confused.

My Refutation and Concession

Some said that robots with common sense are helpful in engineering, medical, housework, agriculture, industry, and combat. But it can make the society even confused. In the engineering, the robots take peoples job. There will be the problem of mass unemployment. In the medical, the operation error is more fatal than humans mistakes. And in the combat, Robots are dangerous weapon because they don't feel any pain. 

Also, there are the people who argue that robots with common sense solve the society problems. For example, 'Ibo' is the pet dog robots, it can express the emotion like anger, surprising, and hunger . These robots are using well to senior citizens who live alone, and the people who needs some friends. But It even can make a backfire. The robots don't have any emotions, so people will notice they are not like human soon. It make the people more futile.
But I agree that the robots without common sense can be helpful to human.

Research 5

Source: http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/robot-ethics


My Topic:
We should copy our common sense to robots.

What I hope to learn from this source:

It is about robot ethics.

Notes:

Ethics is often slow to catch up with technological developments. This authoritative and accessible volume fills a gap in both scholarly literature and policy discussion, offering an impressive collection of expert analyses of the most crucial topics in this increasingly important field.

Final Thoughts: We should follow the robot ethics.

Week8. The Confirmation

1. What is my thesis?

We should copy our common sense to robots.

2. What types of source am I using to defend my thesis? 

The movies about robots.

3. Are my arguments mostly based on evidence, logic or emotion?

My arguments are mostly based on evidence and logic with the example of the movies.

 My Confirmation

  Artificial intelligence systems are based on the ability of a machine to learn. Babies for example are born with the ability to learn and seek out knowledge, in the same way if an artificial intelligence system is created, it too will be the equivalent to a new born baby in the sense that is will learn and seek out knowledge. Although the human brain's ability far surpasses any computer, if AI was created and it was powerful enough it would be just like a baby. It could be taught to be good or bad. A great example is that  the author states, "Because AI is learning based, there is a fearful thought in mind, will machines learn that being rich and successful is an advantage, then rage war against economic powers and then control the world? This is not unreasonable but as every major religion and philosophy tells us, you cannot appreciate happiness without experiencing sadness. If we are going to create, or help create, a truly intelligent being, then we have to accept that it will learn to hate, as well as to love. It will know bad, as well as Good, Wrong, as well as Right". Because many theorists and scientists believe that it is not unreasonable that AI can go wrong there have been propositions to develop AI with safeguards so that we can shut them down in case they turn against humans or do not obey commands. In recent years there has also been the development of a non for profit organization named "The Singularity Institution for Artificial Intelligence".

Research 4

Source: http://movie.naver.com/movie/bi/mi/basic.nhn?code=38420


My Topic:
We should copy our common sense to robots.

What I hope to learn from this source:

Robots out of humans controlling can be dangerous.

Notes:

the robots in this movie have emotions and common sense. 
the robots rose the revolt to humans. so humans become dangerous.

Final Thoughts: 

we can't copy our common sense to robots.

Week7. The Narration

My persuasive argument thesis is:  We should copy our common sense to robots.

1. What do people already know about my topic?

people already knows that robots are helpful but it also dangerous.

 .

2. What research has already been done about my topic?

http://blog.naver.com/mocienews/100066752985

it is about that robot have already evolved as it can help our difficult, danger, dirty things.

http://on1yharry.blog.me/220091799313

it is about that people abuse robot which have some emotion and common sense.

http://movie.naver.com/movie/bi/mi/basic.nhn?code=69956
http://movie.naver.com/movie/search/result.nhn?query=%EC%95%84%EC%9D%B4%EB%A1%9C%EB%B4%87&section=all&ie=utf8
http://movie.naver.com/movie/search/result.nhn?query=%BF%A1%C0%CC%BE%C6%C0%CC&section=all

these are the movies that example of my topic.

3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)

There would be horrible things that robots conquer or threat humans like terminator. Or people misuse the robots like movie named A.I without the robot ethics.

My narration

  As robots are developed, humans lives also developed. It is the evidence about robot worlds are coming soon. Robots has affirmative and negative effects. But we couldn't block the technology development even though there are negative sides. 
  Affirmative 'Ibo' is the pet dog robots, it can express the emotion like anger, surprising, and hunger. As our societies become dimness, these robots are helpful to solve the new society problem. And robots also helpful for engineering, medical, housework, agriculture, industry, and combat.  
  Negative If robots intellectual skills are same with humans that can sympathize humans emotion, some people will depend and follow robots than human. They can't feel the value of real life. and the company also don't want to hire human. There will be the problem of mass unemployment. and if the robots are out of the humans controlling, The dangerous things will be happen.

Week6. The Introduction

When I was young, I was dreamed the robot do my homework and housework instead of me. And now, as technologies are developed, my dream will become true in near futures. Robots originated in Czech "robota" means working. Like this meaning, robots work many things for help human. Robots work Difficult, Dirty, Dangerous job instead of humans. for instance, already many household clean the room by automated vacuum cleaners that people don't have to work. It is equipped with a number of sensor, so vacuum can clean the room with avoiding the obstacle. Moreover, robots clean the dirty drain pipes. If there are not robots, human should these dirty things. Robots also surgery people in hospital. Robots are more detailed and elaborated than people, so the dangerous of surgery is less then human. Like this, Robots are helpful to human. If we copy our common sense to robots, our lives can be more comfortable. However, there are also riskness, misuseness, and humans lethargy. So we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.

1. Attention grabber -
I attracted the audience by mentioning about my dream related with robot.

2. Explains the topic -
In the attention grabber, I introduce the word robots origination to say that robots work many things for human.

3. My thesis -
My topic is that 'we should copy our common sense to robots'. I think it is not true.

Week4-5. Classic Argument

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by saying the movie about robots. It is about good image of robots. But I will also mention disadvantages of robots. I will relate  it with my topic.I want to notice people that we should observe the robot ethics. If we copy our common sense to robots, there will occur unethical things. So we shouldn't copy our common sense to robots.

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will give a basic idea disadvantaged and advantaged reasons about robot.

3. The confirmation, which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will explain why I disagree with the topic that we should copy our common sense to robots.     1. people can misuse the robots.(robots ethics) 2. The robots can threat human.(dangerous) 3. people will only depend on robots without their capacities.(dependence)

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

-Some will say that robots with common sense are comfortable because it help our lives. However, it can makes human lose their job. 

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will close with a summary of my previous points by arguing that people should follow the robot ethics. People should know about shortcoming and dagerous things about robot with common sense.